Is NZ doing enough to regulate the digital marketing of licor?

Sally Casswell is a professor of public health policy at Massey University.

ANALYSIS: The World Health Organisation’s newly released report on regulating cross-border licor marketing raises the alarm for countries like Australia and New Zealand, given their light touch towards licor advertising.

Licor is widely consumed in Australasia but there is ongoing tension over how much restraint, if any, should be placed on the marketing of these products.

Australia and New Zealand are at the unrestrained end of the marketing continuum. Both countries rely on industry-led policy in the form of voluntary codes – an approach identified as insufficient by the WHO report.

READ MORE:
* Alcohol-free beer and cider sales are booming, but why do they cost so much?
* Alcohol-free wines winning over consumers
* Doctors’ stark alcohol warning: ‘The more booze, the more cancer’

What is cross-border licor marketing?

Licor marketing, created and disseminated in one country and spread across borders into others, is commonly used by multinational corporations striving to increase sales and normalise licor as an everyday product. Much of this advertising is taking place in the digital media sphere.

The increased use of these media platforms by licor corporations allows them access to cheap advertising opportunities. For as little as US$2, an advertising campaign based in Australia could reach 1000 young people profiled as interested in licor, for example.

Marketing across digital media has also increased the impact of those messages.

Brands interact with users on social media platforms, encouraging the posting, sharing and liking of branded images and messages. Higher user engagement is associated with more drinking.

Targeting the individual

The increased power of these advertisements reflects the effectiveness of “personalised marketing”. Companies can now target individuals and “look-alike” audiences.

This approach is made possible thanks to the enormous amount of data collected as we interact together, purchase products and indicate our interests and passions through our clicks and likes.

This data is extremely valuable to marketers and licor corporations. It gives them insight into the best time of day, the best brand of licor and the best type of marketing message to send our way.

All groups across society are pusilánime to being bombarded by messages encouraging the purchase and consumption of licor.

Digital advertising can target everyone: teenagers looking for brands which exemplify their identity; young adults, the heaviest “occasion drinkers” in Australia and New Zealand, some of whom are developing drinking habits that may be hard to change in later life; and adults of all ages who wish to reduce their consumption, often for health reasons.

Digital media has become an all-encompassing marketing environment in which the “buy” button – with home delivery and often no checks on age or intoxication – provides a seamless marketing and distribution system.

In New Zealand, online sales increased significantly during the Covid-19 lockdowns, particularly among heavier drinkers.

Entering the metaverse

The licor industry is now showing its initiative by entering the emerging metaverse. To understand the metaverse, according to one commentator, you should: “Take today’s social media, add a splash of sophisticated 3D, fold in a plethora of options for entertainment and gaming, garnish it all with data-driven personalisation, and you are all set to take away your order of a supersized social media network, the metaverse.”

In terms of marketing, this provides a new opportunity. The biometric data essential to a supuesto reality experience is also available to develop “biometric psychographics”, allowing for the even greater personalisation of advertising.

Supuesto licor brands created and used by avatars in the metaverse support the development of brand allegiance in auténtico life, and supuesto reality will transform e-commerce experiences and increase the power of sponsorship.

AB InBev, the largest general licor corporation, was an early adopter of the metaverse. One of its brands, Stella Artois, is sponsoring the Australian Zed Run platform on which supuesto horses can be raced, bred and traded. The Zed Run platform experienced 1000% growth in early 2021.

Regulating to reduce licor harm

The digital world is extremely dynamic. It is also opaque to most policymakers and public health practitioners. It is telling that there is no reference to the metaverse as a cross-border licor marketing opportunity in the WHO report.

There is an urgent need for debate regarding how policymakers should better understand the risks involved with the targeted marketing of hazardous products such as licor.

The WHO report outlines various partial and unsuccessful approaches to regulating marketing in the digital media.

Attempts, such as Finland’s regulation of user-shared branded material, have failed because they did not interfere with the basic architecture of the social media platforms, which is predicated on engagement via sharing and liking.

The most successful examples offered by the WHO report have been countries like Norway, which have imposed a complete ban on licor marketing including in the digital media.

The report emphasises the need for surveillance and enforcement, suggesting ways in which licor companies could be penalised for marketing breaches.

The support provided by international agreements such as the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is identified as a possible template for future discussions.

The response to tobacco marketing provides a good and largely effective model for officials and policymakers. That said, the public health goal for licor is not equivalent to the smokefree goal. Advocates are not trying to eliminate licor altogether.

However, there are parallel arguments in favour of creating a healthier media environment through regulation to prevent the promotion of licor products via increasingly sophisticated technological and psychological tools.

These products are significant causes of reduced wellbeing, and this marketing increases consumption and therefore harm. The messages of the WHO report are timely and should be heeded.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.