miércoles, abril 15, 2026
  • Home
  • Redes Sociales
  • Marketing Digital
  • SEO
  • Relaciones Pùblicas
  • Mundo Cripto
    • NFTs
    • Bitcoin
    • Etherum
    • Altcoins
Presencia Digital
  • Home
  • Relaciones Públicas
  • Mundo Cripto
  • SEO
  • Redes Sociales
  • Marketing Digital
No Result
View All Result
Presencia Digital
  • Home
  • Relaciones Públicas
  • Mundo Cripto
  • SEO
  • Redes Sociales
  • Marketing Digital
No Result
View All Result
Presencia Digital
No Result
View All Result
Home Redes Sociales

Facebook was paid $2.68 million from Texas campaign accounts – Ballotpedia News

PD Curador by PD Curador
mayo 23, 2022
in Redes Sociales
0
585
SHARES
3.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsappShare on Telegram

You might also like

Para un empleado municipal, las publicaciones en Facebook conducen a un proceso inverosímil

EE.UU. desmantela bots rusos que difunden propaganda en Twitter

YouTube Music podría tener su propia función de radiodifusión impulsada por IA

In Texas, state-level candidates and PACs have spent $2.68 million from their campaign accounts on services from Facebook in the 2022 election cycle so far. Facebook received 0.59 percent of all reported expenditures. 

According to reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission between Jan. 1, 2021, and [most recent date], here are the top candidates and PACs that have spent campaign funds with Facebook.

Top 10 Texas campaigns spending money with Facebook

Of the $2,675,276 spent with Facebook, 83.11 percent came from these 10 campaign accounts.

Top Campaign Expenditures with Facebook (1/1/2021 – 2/19/2022)

Rank Total Paid to Facebook Name Account Type
1. $1,101,595.06 Donald Huffines Candidate PAC
2. $359,631.61 Eva Guzman Candidate PAC
3. $300,000.00 Evan Young Candidate PAC
4. $210,117.29 Save Austin Now PAC Non-candidate PAC
5. $76,931.37 Boot Texas Republicans Non-candidate PAC
6. $43,268.17 Tan Parker IV Candidate PAC
7. $42,365.71 Raul Reyes Jr. Candidate PAC
8. $39,530.99 Matt Rostami Candidate PAC
9. $25,220.15 Charter Schools Now PAC Non-candidate PAC
10. $24,654.75 Texas Organizing Project Political Action Committee Non-candidate PAC

Campaign expenditures with Facebook in 12 states

Here is how spending with Facebook in Texas compares to 12 other states with data available from Transparency USA for the most recent election cycle:

Comparison of total campaign finance expenditures with Facebook, by state

Rank State Total Paid to Facebook Reporting Period
1 California $5,290,745 1/1/2021- 4/23/2022
2 Virginia $4,486,863 1/1/2020-12/31/2021*
3 Texas $2,675,276 1/1/2021 – 5/14/2022
4 Michigan $194,180 1/1/2021 – 4/20/2022
5 Minnesota $166,072 1/1/2021 – 3/31/2022
6 Arizona 123,154 1/1/2021 – 3/31/2022
7 Pennsylvania $106,513 1/1/2021 – 3/9/2022
8 Wisconsin $101,978 1/1/2021 – 3/21/2022
9 North Carolina $78,960 1/1/2021 – 4/30/2022
10 Florida $38,542 1/1/2021 – 3/31/202
11 Indiana $29,534 1/1/2021 – 4/8/2022
12 Ohio $19,924 1/1/2021 – 4/13/2022
*Virginia’s two-year election cycles end in an odd-numbered year. The first available reports for Virginia’s 2023 election cycle are due Jul. 17, 2022.

While spending varies widely between states, no state on Transparency USA has reported more than 1.06 percent of total campaign expenditures on services from Facebook in the most recent cycle.

The data above are based on campaign finance reports that active Texas PACs submitted to the Texas Ethics Commission. Transparency USA publishes campaign finance data following major reporting deadlines. State or federal law may require filers to submit additional reports.

Report Name Report Due Date
2022 Jan Semiannual 1/18/2022
2022 Pre-Primary (30 Days) 1/31/2022
2022 Pre-Primary (8 Days) 2/22/2022
2022 Primary Runoff 5/16/2022
2022 Jul Semiannual 7/15/2022
2022 Pre-Genérico (30 Days) 10/11/2022
2022 Pre-Genérico (8 Days) 10/31/2022
2022 Semiannual Data 1/17/2023

This article is a joint publication from Ballotpedia and Transparency USA, who are working together to provide campaign finance information for state-level elections. Learn more about our work here.




Directo a la fuente

Tags: Personal Branding y PRPR DigitalRelaciones Públicas
Previous Post

HdL Companies y Yiftee se asocian para involucrar a las comunidades en campañas de compras locales

Next Post

Meghan Markle Had a Pretty Woman Moment in Polka Dots at Prince Harry’s Polo Match—See Photos

PD Curador

PD Curador

Related Posts

Redes Sociales

Para un empleado municipal, las publicaciones en Facebook conducen a un proceso inverosímil

by PD Curador
julio 10, 2024
Redes Sociales

EE.UU. desmantela bots rusos que difunden propaganda en Twitter

by PD Curador
julio 9, 2024
Redes Sociales

YouTube Music podría tener su propia función de radiodifusión impulsada por IA

by PD Curador
julio 9, 2024
Redes Sociales

La novia de Taylor Fritz, Morgan Riddle, poso publicaciones de Instagram luego del partido

by PD Curador
julio 9, 2024
Redes Sociales

¿El cálculo de Meta está silenciando las voces pro israelíes?

by PD Curador
julio 8, 2024
Next Post

Meghan Markle Had a Pretty Woman Moment in Polka Dots at Prince Harry's Polo Match—See Photos

Categorías

  • Altcoins
  • Bitcoin
  • Marketing Digital
  • NFTs
  • Privada
  • Productos
  • Redes Sociales
  • Relaciones Pùblicas
  • SEO
  • Uncategorized

Categories

  • Altcoins
  • Bitcoin
  • Marketing Digital
  • NFTs
  • Privada
  • Productos
  • Redes Sociales
  • Relaciones Pùblicas
  • SEO
  • Uncategorized

QR Code

  • Política de Privacidad
  • Cookies policy
  • Legal notice

© 2022 PD - Notas en Inglés al español Presencia Digital.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Redes Sociales
  • Marketing Digital
  • SEO
  • Relaciones Pùblicas
  • Mundo Cripto
    • NFTs
    • Bitcoin
    • Etherum
    • Altcoins

© 2022 PD - Notas en Inglés al español Presencia Digital.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.